On (12/08/09 17:24), Jukka Salmi wrote:
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:24:24 +0200
> From: Jukka Salmi <j+...@2009.salmi.ch>
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: Re: [dev] [PATCH] dwm -- Proper SIGCHLD usage , fix issue with
>  uncollected processes
> List-Id: dev mail list <dev.suckless.org>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-20)
> 
> Premysl 'Anydot' Hruby --> dev (2009-08-11 23:43:58 +0200):
> > This is much cleaner and portable way of using SIGCHLD. It also disallow
> > existence of defunct processes, one which are executed for example from
> > .Xsession before (on the end) exec /path/../dwm
> > ---
> >  dwm.c |    8 +++++---
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c
> > index 873b794..3cb4a8e 100644
> > --- a/dwm.c
> > +++ b/dwm.c
> > @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static void setlayout(const Arg *arg);
> >  static void setmfact(const Arg *arg);
> >  static void setup(void);
> >  static void showhide(Client *c);
> > -static void sigchld(int signal);
> > +static void sigchld(int unused);
> >  static void spawn(const Arg *arg);
> >  static void tag(const Arg *arg);
> >  static void tagmon(const Arg *arg);
> > @@ -1428,6 +1428,8 @@ setup(void) {
> >     int w;
> >     XSetWindowAttributes wa;
> >  
> > +   signal(SIGCHLD, sigchld);
> > +
> >     /* init screen */
> >     screen = DefaultScreen(dpy);
> >     root = RootWindow(dpy, screen);
> > @@ -1496,13 +1498,13 @@ showhide(Client *c) {
> >  
> >  
> >  void
> > -sigchld(int signal) {
> > +sigchld(int unusedl) {
> >     while(0 < waitpid(-1, NULL, WNOHANG));
> > +   signal(SIGCHLD, sigchld);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void
> >  spawn(const Arg *arg) {
> > -   signal(SIGCHLD, sigchld);
> >     if(fork() == 0) {
> >             if(dpy)
> >                     close(ConnectionNumber(dpy));
> 
> Seems fine, but -- assuming POSIX.1 reliable signals -- you don't need
> to reestablish the handler before returning from it.  Or should systems
> with the old semantics really be supported by dwm?
> 

According to POSIX, if the signal is blocked after sighandler or not is
undefined. In case of Linux and GLibc it depends on version of Glibc and
-std etc... (read man 2 signal, section Portability).

-Ph

-- 
Premysl "Anydot" Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
-
I'm a signature virus. Please add me to your signature and help me spread!

Reply via email to