Hi, community.

Currently, we have completed the majority of tasks in the areas of [1] and [2]. 
However, I have noticed that the community still fails to fully adhere to 
certain standards when merging contributors' work [3], 
although this does not imply a lack of consensus among 
contributors, committers, and the community. 


Therefore, I have referenced [4] and introduced a boring-cyborg.yml[5] file 
for the StreamPark repository to improve this situation, 
This will help both contributors and committers clarify the adjustments needed 
to 
maintain consistency with [2] from the early stages of contributing (i.e., when 
submitting a PR).


Due to permission limitations, I would appreciate the assistance of any PMC 
member 
to help complete certain tasks in order to finalize this improvement, 
including but not limited to:


- Configuring the main StreamPark repository to activate the workflow defined 
in [5].
- Verifying the correctness of the configuration in [5]:
  - Whether the standardization of PR titles can be correctly validated.
  - Whether the PR ISSUE ID can be successfully linked to the corresponding 
ISSUE.
  - Whether the workflow can accurately label PRs with module information 
according to the locations of changes involved in the PR.


Thank you.

Best regards,
Yuepeng Pan


[1] https://github.com/apache/streampark/issues/2986
[2] 
https://streampark.apache.org/community/submit_guide/code_style_and_quality_guide
[3] 
https://github.com/apache/streampark/commits/dev/?since=2025-08-01&until=2025-12-30
[4] 
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/blob/5ac251f90e803ea7cc8d35525237cf829efd2658/.github/boring-cyborg.yml
[5] https://github.com/apache/streampark/pull/4320

Reply via email to