The issue here is how we do upgration. I can have two options in mind: 1. Keep _2.12 and simply remove _2.11 logics. Once we'd like to support 2.13, we can add back the variant logic to release both _2.12 and _2.13.
2. Remove the suffix and maintain only one scala version. When we want to upgrade scala version, do it at once. This is no a pragmatic solution since no intermediate status. I previously think of Akka's holding multiple folder for different Scala versions, but finally figure out that it's the same as option 1. Best, tison. ConradJam <[email protected]> 于2023年8月25日周五 23:28写道： > I Agree Scala2.11 out > Starting from Flink1.15+, Flink only supports 2.12 and blocks some things > of Scala > Spark supports 2.12 and 2.13 from 3.0+ > After quitting, it will help us spend more time dealing with the > differentiation of other non-Scala versions > > > > Huajie Wang <[email protected]> 于2023年8月25日周五 13:09写道： > > > If there are no further opinions, this discussion will automatically be > > closed within 72 hours. This proposal will not take effect. > > > > > > > > Best, > > Huajie Wang > > > > > > > > Huajie Wang <[email protected]> 于2023年8月25日周五 13:06写道： > > > > > After thinking about it, we have decided to add the Scala version on > all > > > modules. This is because we are not tied to a specific Scala version > and > > we > > > need to consider support for higher Scala versions in the future. > > Removing > > > the Scala version would confuse users and also create complications for > > > supporting multiple Scala versions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > Huajie Wang > > > > > > > > > > > > Huajie Wang <[email protected]> 于2023年8月24日周四 23:30写道： > > > > > >> hi tison: > > >> > > >> Thanks for your comments, We konw flink scala free from 1.15 onwards > and > > >> the current mainstream scala version for spark being 2.12, considering > > the > > >> practical situation, tIn the short term, the issue of upgrade strategy > > >> is not likely to be considered. Looking ahead in the long run, there > > >> will be an upgrade to 2.13 or 3.x, which is also a concern for me. I > > >> welcome your opinions on this. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Huajie Wang > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> tison <[email protected]> 于2023年8月24日周四 23:10写道： > > >> > > >>> What is the strategy if we'd catch up later scala version? Or we'd > pin > > >>> the > > >>> scala version forever? > > >>> > > >>> Huajie Wang <[email protected]>于2023年8月24日 周四23:08写道： > > >>> > > >>> > hi StreamPark community: > > >>> > > > >>> > After discussions[1], starting from version StreamPark 2.2, Scala > > 2.11 > > >>> will > > >>> > no longer be supported and the Scala version will be removed from > all > > >>> > module names[2]. The default Scala version is now 2.12. Welcome to > > hear > > >>> > your opinion. > > >>> > > > >>> > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/mx8vgq4jp8dk2wgm8m5g1mmq806wzjzg > > >>> > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampark/pull/2974 > > >>> > > > >>> > Best, > > >>> > Huajie Wang > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > >>> Best, > > >>> tison. > > >>> > > >> > > > > > -- > Best > > ConradJam >
