hi tison:

Thanks for your reminder. Currently, there are long-term support
versions of JDK 8, 11, and 17. Version 17 is too new, and considering
the usage of users, upgrading directly to 17 would be risky and
radical. Comparatively, JDK 11 may be a better choice, and many
projects already support JDK11. What do you think?


Best,
Huajie Wang



tison <[email protected]> 于2023年5月3日周三 18:15写道:

> One thing to be considered is that Java 11 is end of active support this
> year[1].
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
> [1] https://endoflife.date/java
>
>
> Huajie Wang <[email protected]> 于2023年5月3日周三 18:09写道:
>
> > +1
> > Actually, there is also a proposal to stop supporting JDK 8 in Flink, and
> > the flink-kubernetes-operator also requires JDK 11. Considering the
> future
> > functionality and long-term development, upgrading the JDK version is
> very
> > necessary. Currently, Scala is simultaneously maintaining two versions:
> > 2.11 and 2.12, which causes problems for project release and
> maintenance. I
> > agree to upgrade both JDK and Scala.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Huajie Wang
> >
> >
> >
> > Linying <[email protected]> 于2023年4月27日周四 13:09写道:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > StreamPark uses Java 1.8 and Scala 2.11/2.12, both of which are
> > relatively
> > > old versions. The mainstream JDK adoption version is already at 11 or
> 17,
> > > while the mainstream Scala adoption version is 2.13. Flink has been
> > > supporting both JDK 1.8 and 11 since 1.10. Since version 1.15, Flink
> only
> > > provides Scala 2.12 binary distribution, and this version does not
> > restrict
> > > the Scala version used by the user.
> > >
> > > So I propose upgrading StreamPark's default Java version to 11 and only
> > > keeping Scala 2.12. Another topic of discussion is, if the minimum
> > required
> > > Flink version we support is above 1.15, then StreamPark's Scala version
> > can
> > > be directly upgraded to 2.13 which is very attractive.
> > >
> > > I invite you all to share your thoughts, concerns or suggestions about
> > > this proposal, so we can reach an informed decision regarding the
> upgrade
> > > process.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your attention and valuable input.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Linying Assad
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to