Hi huajie, Thank you for your reply. There are a few points I want to clarify. Rewrite some modules not means all modules. Just like you said, many modules are stable and no need to change it. But for the long-term development goal of the whole project, unified develop language has to be made. At this stage we can take it one step at a time, such as streampark-common module, the most intuitive feeling is that enumerations mix java and scala in this module. For developers, this pattern is very confusing, So I think we can start a vote and listen to the voice of the developers in community.
Everyone hopes this project could be better. Best wishes Chao Tian Huajie Wang <[email protected]>于2023年3月13日 周一00:01写道： > hi: > > Thanks for starting this discussion, in the streampark project, except for > the streampark-console module is written in java, the rest of the total 40 > modules are written in scala. rewrite the project using java is not a > simple yes or no, it will involve refactor the project, and the migration > of many core modules, in addition to the core contributors in the early > days of the project, How many developers understand the implementation > details of the project? And to be able to commit to this work? So I am > pessimistic about this, > > many modules(scala) is very stable, we have to consider the risk of > refactor and RIO, at least in my opinion, at this stage, this point is not > the reason that hinders the development of the project. > If there is a new module, I think it can be implemented using java, e.g: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampark/pull/2267 > > BTW, @Zhuoyu Chen, I think you can rewrite k8s-mode using java, We can > start with a module and try this. > > > > Best, > Huajie Wang > > > > Yuepeng Pan <[email protected]> 于2023年3月12日周日 20:36写道： > > > Nice proposal~ > > I also agree with this suggestion. > > > > This has nothing to do with the language itself. Scala is a very > excellent > > language, but in the current situation, we need to lower the threshold of > > contributors. Just as we have done a good job in user use, users can > easily > > control our products. > > > > Similarly, if we use Java in a unified way, we have taken an important > > step in lowering the threshold for developers. > > > > Of course, I would also like to hear your ideas. Thank you~! > > > > Best, > > Yuepeng Pan > > > > At 2023-03-12 14:44:47, "Lucifer Tyrant" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >Hi developers, > > > > > >With the release of StreamPark's inaugural Apache version, our platform > is > > >becoming increasingly familiar to the public eye and an ever-growing > > number > > >of developers are also joining the StreamPark community. > > > > > >In order to promote the overall development of the project and reduce > the > > >barrier to contribution, It is necessary for us to standardize the > > >programming language used in the entire project. > > > > > >In my opinion, standardizing the programming language would bring the > > >following benefits: > > > > > >1. Uniformity in code style and interface. > > >2. Enhanced cohesion among project modules, eliminating any sense of > > >disconnection. > > >3. Attracting more contributors to join the project. > > >4. Better compatibility with Flink. > > > > > >What do you think about this? If your guys has some advice, please let > me > > >know and reply this email. > > > > > >Best wishes! > > >Chao Tian > > >
