-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
>> Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
>>> Justin Mason wrote:
>>>> Maybe we should simply not publish a new active.list or rule updates
>>>> after
>>>> a weekly -net mass-check -- it always seems to have significantly
>>>> different freqs, probably due to smaller amounts of mail being checked.
>>> Hmm... that might be it.  This one just caught my eye as it happened
>>> to remove all of the new rules and a lot more other rules than normal
>>> for a -net mass-check.  I just find it odd that *all* of the new
>>> rules were removed this time using the same submitters as the
>>> previous week.
>>
>> I wonder if that indicates that old mail is being mass-checked?
>>
>> Some of the corpora are very out of date -- we should probably change
>> the backend to be more stringent about measuring rates against only
>> the freshest spam...
> 
> That could be it.  Theo's non-net mass-check goes back 90 days, while
> his net mass-check goes back 35 days.  Combined with me not getting
> around to setting up net mass-checks (my non-net mass-checks go back 42
> days), now that I've got a broadband connection again, we could be
> introducing considerable bounce right there.  This weekend's -net
> mass-check based active.list should make it clear as to whether it was a
> ruleqa glitch or a corpora age issue.
> 
> On the other hand, a lot of similar/identical spam seems to disappear
> and reappear a few times over the course of about two months or so, so
> we don't want too narrow a view.
> 
> 
>>> In any case, yeah, we need to introduce some dampening in the rule
>>> promotion/demotion to prevent rule bounce.  I've got a few loose
>>> ideas on how to do it, not sure when I'll have time to look into it
>>> though.
>>
>> +1.  anything you come up with will probably be better than what we
>> have now, ie. nothing ;)
> 
> ha -- now there's a vote of confidence if I ever saw one! :)
> 
> 
> Daryl

My corpus there I know is way out of date. I think I should just dump it
and start over.
Also I'm +1 in volunteering Daryl, HAR! /me runs and hides

- --

 -Doc

 Penguins: Do it on the ice.
   8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37

 SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGQOC9qOEeBwEpgcsRAkrnAJ4g/6YJNWMJ7gXUZdI37cKQOr1JRACfdHBT
YQiccLut5PWvb/jVIw3ydRE=
=zrrc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to