+1 to try.

Especially if the attempt includes the "exempt PR" label feature that
Eric linked to.  I'd use that pretty frequently in my workflow, as I
often push code for feedback without knowing exactly when I'll be able
to return to it and get it "over the finish line".

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 10:46 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 to try
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 3:43 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 to try.
> >
> > 60 days for stale and another 60 days before close should be enough imo.
> >
> > We can set the ‘close-pr-label’ for easier reference of what prs were auto
> > closed, should anyone wish to do archeology or re-open stuff that obviously
> > went below people’s radar despite two notifications to the list.
> >
> > Jan Høydahl
> >
> > > On 22 Sep 2024, at 15:11, Eric Pugh <de...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > What if we tried it for a few months and then reevaluated?
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > >> On Sep 20, 2024, at 3:02 PM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Any commit or comment on a stale PR will make it un-stale for 60 more
> > days too.
> > >>
> > >> Jan Høydahl
> > >>
> > >>>> On 19 Sep 2024, at 23:14, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Upon seeing a "stale" warning, how do I signal to the bot that this PR
> > >>> shouldn't be closed soon?  Or perhaps upon re-opening, the bot ought to
> > >>> back off on this one forevermore?
> > >>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 3:06 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1 I’ve tried suggesting this several times, also for abandoned JIRA
> > >>>> issues, but always big pushback.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If we get a stale warning and then, if no one cares, another
> > notification
> > >>>> when auto-closing, no one can say they were not warned. And old
> > closed PRs
> > >>>> can always be re-opened, but at that point there will be so many merge
> > >>>> conflicts so who’d want to anyway? 😉
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Jan Høydahl
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>> On 19 Sep 2024, at 20:07, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I don't see in the dev list here a discussion on auto-closing old
> > PRs
> > >>>> but
> > >>>>> FWIW I'm in favor of that provided we could somehow choose to keep a
> > PR
> > >>>>> open that we're still passionate about, that we don't want to be
> > >>>>> forgotten.  This was discussed in the meetup yesterday.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 10:56 AM Eric Pugh <
> > >>>> ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> When I picked up https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2225 it was
> > cool
> > >>>> to
> > >>>>>> see the “start-script” label!  Thanks!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Jan 26, 2024, at 10:33 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The StaleBot is now active, running once a day at midnight.
> > >>>>>>> I started in a conservative way, only labeling 10 PRs a day, and
> > >>>> setting
> > >>>>>> the threshold at 60 days.
> > >>>>>>> This gives us some time to evaluate without labeling the entire
> > >>>> backlog.
> > >>>>>>> Will be interesting to see whether the Bot results in some
> > fogotten PRs
> > >>>>>> being completed.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Jan
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 8. jan. 2024 kl. 23:10 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Got some initial (positive) feedback on the auto-categorization
> > PR and
> > >>>>>> plan to merge on Thursday, giving you some more time to review. I
> > feel I
> > >>>>>> have not 100% nailed perfect labels. Obviously we can't auto label
> > >>>> things
> > >>>>>> like feature/bug, or versions, so this is only a "category". Ideally
> > >>>> there
> > >>>>>> would be a a 1:1 between these "category" labels and the
> > "Components"
> > >>>>>> defined in JIRA. But here are 96 different "Components" there, most
> > of
> > >>>> them
> > >>>>>> are old/irrelevant and not always very good IMO. So I'd rather
> > attempt
> > >>>> to
> > >>>>>> align JIRA components with whatever we come up with here...
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Lucene has just put their StaleBot to work, and I created
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2184 to do the same for Solr.
> > Have
> > >>>> a
> > >>>>>> look.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Jan
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 6. jan. 2024 kl. 01:21 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com
> > >:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> We tend to not use the GitHub's PR labels we have defined.
> > >>>>>>>>> So I whipped up https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2180 which
> > is
> > >>>>>> configured to auto-label PRs based on what files are changed.
> > Feedback
> > >>>>>> welcome.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Also, I hope we can implement StaleBot for labeling PRs as stale.
> > >>>>>> Lucene is going to test it, see
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12813. If that goes well,
> > let's
> > >>>>>> copy their config :)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> - Jan
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> _______________________
> > >>>>>> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC |
> > 434.466.1467 |
> > >>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> > >>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> > >>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> > >>>>>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered
> > to be
> > >>>>>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
> > of
> > >>>>>> whether attachments are marked as such.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to