Yeah.. I guess if I want the “over all holistic look”, I probably need to just volunteer to do it!
And honestly, maybe we make too big of a deal of CHANGES.txt? > On Jul 26, 2024, at 6:58 AM, Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is currently such a step, but it's focused on looking for duplicate > entries. Editorial review at release time is difficult because Solr is so > big, and probably almost nobody stays on top of all the changes. Review at > PR/Checkin would seem to me to be the best route. > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 2:46 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com > <mailto:ep...@opensourceconnections.com>> > wrote: > >> Fair on the “make work” side of things. I know I skim through it at >> various times, but we also have our Migration guide in the Ref Guide too…. >> >> I do look forward to a future with a simpler less confusing CHANGES.txt! >> >>> On Jul 24, 2024, at 2:21 PM, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> I like the idea yet I also wonder if most folks simply won't care to >>> provide any input anyway, and then it becomes just yet another release >>> task. Also, I wouldn't want to recommend any process that would need >>> to be rethought if we streamline CHANGES.txt management (e.g. we spoke >>> of using separate files and a script that generates a combined one). >>> But we could piggy-back off of such... like that would end up >>> generating a CHANGES.txt section of the release, and thus it could >>> easily be posted as a PR for follow-up editing. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 12:44 PM Eric Pugh >>> <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I was thinking that as part of our release process we should have a >> “review CHANGES.txt” step? I don’t know if that is already in there, but >> it might be a good step for us as a community to have a single point in >> time to review that to make sure it’s clear and accurate…. >>>> >>>> We have lots of folks contributing to it, each with their own style and >> their own opinion of what change is what type of change, and so maybe >> having a step in the release process to say “Hey, now is the time to review >> these to make it look the best it can” might help? >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> _______________________ >>>> Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com < >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < >> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> >>>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < >> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw >>> >>>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to >> be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of >> whether attachments are marked as such. >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>> >> >> _______________________ >> Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com < >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < >> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> >> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < >> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> >> >> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be >> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of >> whether attachments are marked as such. >> >> > > -- > http://www.needhamsoftware.com <http://www.needhamsoftware.com/> (work) > https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) _______________________ Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.
