We'll need to upgrade all the build servers (Apache, Thetaphi, Crave).
I started by choosing just the OWASP build for Solr as a trial to see
if it works without actually merging your PR.



On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:59 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 to move Solr main to Lucene's version (21) as soon as you wish.
> Like just go for it now if you are motivated.  I echo Jan's preference
> to not make "sweeping changes" yet however.  On the server side, we
> can be fairly up to date with Java versions.  This does force plugin
> writers (and people love their Solr plugins) so I don't think we
> should pick 22 so as to not annoy our users who cannot upgrade
> aggressively).
>
> We should not be so aggressive with SolrJ!  Set the language there
> (and thus solr-api, a dependency) to the 17 language / compiled-class
> level, at least on the "main" (not test) codeline.  The test codeline
> uses solr-test-framework which uses solr-core thus that must always
> match the server end.
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 1:47 AM sanjay dutt
> <sanjaydutt.in...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >  The purpose of this email thread is to initiate a discussion about 
> > upgrading the minimum Java version (Could be same as Lucene minimum Java 
> > for main branch i.e. 21) for the main branch. We seek to understand the 
> > community's major concerns and gather their guidance on this matter.
> > Regards,Sanjay

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to