We can give another week to cut the RC. That's probably a good idea anyway. But the point of a branch is to allow people to keep working on things they don't think should go in. There's danger in pushing something big in at the last moment. For example I might or might not push in SOLR-17151 (I'm on the fence, feel free to comment in the ticket/PR and talk me in or out of that), but I've already decided to delay the larger and more risky SOLR-17158 even though it's fairly close as well. I want it to bake longer.
We have plenty of content for a release, and of course there's nothing stopping another release in a month if we have a fresh set of stuff come in quickly. In any case there's been a couple +1's to the original plan so I made the branch as promised. If there's a consensus to delay we can of course move it as needed. On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:35 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Indeed, quite a few PRs are almost ready. Can we push the feature freeze by > a week, please? > > On Fri, 12 Apr, 2024, 8:45 pm David Smiley, <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > We do have a lot of PRs that appear to be in an advanced state of > > readiness. Maybe some have been reviewed by local search teams even > > albeit not publically here. I'm hoping we could rally around more > > peer review of these to get the hard work of others merged. I suppose > > this is an ever-present concern but an impending release reminds me of > > our PR backlog. For my part, I scanned through a couple pages of PRs; > > looked at some. > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 12:55 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > It's been about 3 months since we started our last release discussion, > > and Jira > > > shows > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17126?jql=project%20%3D%20SOLR%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%209.6.0%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20ASC%2C%20status%20DESC > > > > > > that we have: > > > > > > 5 bug fixes > > > 1 feature (query time distributed stats disable) > > > 11 improvements > > > 7 sub tasks, several of which represent new features including CPU > > limited > > > requests > > > 3 tasks, including the upgrade to Lucene 9.10 > > > > > > Only two are not resolved, but one seems to have commits and the other > > had > > > a PR ready in late Feb... > > > > > > It seems like there are quite a few things now that should be made more > > > widely available to users. > > > > > > I'm happy to volunteer as RM, though it will be my first time so I may > > have > > > questions. I propose that we cut the branch Next Monday April 15 and > > > prepare the first RC. > > > > > > - Gus > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > > > https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > > > -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
