It's probably cleanest to create a new ticket of type="bug", and then link
back to SOLR-16879 - that way the "Fix Version" field can be unambiguous.

On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 1:33 PM Pierre Salagnac <pierre.salag...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for your input.
> Unfortunately there is no parameter for that. This is hardcoded at 5.
>
> Yes, I'm already working on a fix.
>
> Sorry to hijack this thread for the 9.5 release... Is a new Jira required
> for such an issue?
> I'm unclear with this, since the regression was introduced in a version
> that is already released.
>
>
> Le lun. 5 févr. 2024 à 19:03, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> > Interesting - 9.4 has been out there since October, I'm surprised no one
> > reported this earlier.  But I guess there's always a lag for teams to
> > upgrade to new versions...
> >
> > Is the number of "expensive" tasks configurable, such that there's a
> > workaround for collections with many shards?  Assuming not, this does
> sound
> > serious enough to "fail" the VOTE as it'd mean that backup/restore is
> > essentially broken for sufficiently large collections.
> >
> > In terms of SOLR-16879 - any chance you're willing to work on a fix
> Pierre?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 12:52 PM Pierre Salagnac <
> pierre.salag...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The regression was introduced in 9.4.
> > >
> > > Le lun. 5 févr. 2024 à 18:31, Pierre Salagnac <
> pierre.salag...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > > Hi Jason,
> > > >
> > > > A regression was introduced in backup/restore for large collections.
> > This
> > > > was reported in a comment of SOLR-16879[1].
> > > > Should this be considered as a blocker for 9.5 ?
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16879?focusedCommentId=17813066&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17813066
> > > >
> > > > Le lun. 5 févr. 2024 à 15:44, Jason Gerlowski <
> gerlowsk...@apache.org>
> > a
> > > > écrit :
> > > >
> > > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.5.0
> > > >>
> > > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.5.0-RC1-rev-1fb7d127fc064b0bab8435a431d71a44050e654b
> > > >>
> > > >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > >>
> > > >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.5.0-RC1-rev-1fb7d127fc064b0bab8435a431d71a44050e654b
> > > >>
> > > >> You can build a release-candidate of the official docker images
> (full
> > &
> > > >> slim) using the following command:
> > > >>
> > > >> SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.5.0-RC1-rev-1fb7d127fc064b0bab8435a431d71a44050e654b/solr
> > > >> &&
> > > >> <
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.5.0-RC1-rev-1fb7d127fc064b0bab8435a431d71a44050e654b/solr&&;
> > > >
> > > >> \
> > > >>   docker build
> > > >> $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/9.5.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full \
> > > >>     --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > >>     -t solr-rc:9.5.0-1 && \
> > > >>   docker build
> > > >> $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/9.5.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim \
> > > >>     --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > >>     -t solr-rc:9.5.0-1-slim
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-02-08
> > 15:00
> > > >> UTC.
> > > >>
> > > >> [ ] +1  approve
> > > >> [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >>
> > > >> Here is my +1
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to