I don't think there is anything holding it up right now. I'll merge it to main hopefully today. Let it sit and see what happens with test results. Then look at backport to 9.x next week or week after.
Kevin Risden On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:01 AM Houston Putman <[email protected]> wrote: > We decided that the Jetty upgrade is important enough to be included in > 9.2. > > Lets get this merged then take a look at Jetty 11! > Anything else holding this up Kevib? > > - Houston > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 9:47 AM Eric Pugh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Was chatting with folks about SOLR-16368, which starts migrating tests > > over to the Http 2 Solr client, and someone mentioned that until we get > to > > Jetty 10, and the impending bug fix that will probably only show up on > > Jetty 10, that this PR will potentially increase flakiness of our tests. > > > > So... Whats the plan for us to get to the Jetty 10? Is this something > > that we can do in a point release, say in 9.2? Or do we have to wait > for > > Solr 10? > > > > I was hoping to get these changes in for both Solr 10 and Solr 9, but > > maybe if it's tied to Jetty 10, and that is tied to Solr 10, then it > needs > > to just go to main??? > > > > Thanks! > > > > On 2022/10/24 19:55:17 Kevin Risden wrote: > > > Mark put together the initial Jetty 10 upgrade and I've been polishing > > off > > > the remaining pieces: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/585 > > > > > > I think this is in at least a reviewable state and a few folks have > > already > > > chimed in. It would be good to get a few more sets of eyes on this. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Kevin Risden > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
