I think I'm going to cut the v0.4.0 release branch later this week.

There are 3 PRs remaining for this release which should be merged by
Wednesday or Thursday:

   - Configuration options to support an additional client TLS cert in
   addition to the server certificate
   <https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/312>
   - Change information in release wizard
   <https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/315>
   - Option to watch for updates to the mTLS cert used by the operator to
   call Solr pods <https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/318>

The v0.5.0 release shouldn't be too far after v0.4.0, and we can focus on
the backup stuff and Kubernetes v1.22 support then.

- Houston

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks and done (see "Solr Version Expectations for Operator")!
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 12:03 PM Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm starting to work through a few potential
> >> improvements, specifically involving the operator's backup support
> >
> >
> > Sounds good. Tim and I are taking some time with this more advanced TLS
> support for Solr Clouds, so these may be able to land in v0.4.0.
> > But if they end up in v0.5.0, it's not the end of the world. That will
> have to be released sometime soon anyway, to add support for Kubernetes
> v1.22 clusters.
> >
> >> One question this raises in my mind though: are we targeting
> >> particular Solr operator releases at particular Solr versions (or
> >> ranges of Solr versions)?
> >
> >
> > Mind asking this on another thread? I have a response ready, but would
> love to have that discussion be separate from the v0.4.0 release.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 3:29 PM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I suggest that we have start a feature freeze in two weeks, on August
> 4
> >>
> >> Sounds good to me.  I'm starting to work through a few potential
> >> improvements, specifically involving the operator's backup support,
> >> but don't need to target any particular version afaik, as long as
> >> there's no blocker or restriction on doing other releases down the
> >> road.
> >>
> >> One question this raises in my mind though: are we targeting
> >> particular Solr operator releases at particular Solr versions (or
> >> ranges of Solr versions)?  The repo README calls out Kubernetes
> >> version compatibility but doesn't speak to Solr compatibility that I
> >> saw.  I imagine this isn't a huge issue generally assuming Solr's
> >> docker image structure stays relatively unchanged, but it does matter
> >> in some situations: e.g. if the operator wanted to add a feature
> >> taking advantage of a Solr feature only introduced in, say, 8.8.
> >> Maybe this is its own thread though...
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:37 AM Houston Putman <
> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The Solr helm chart is mainly merely templating the SolrCloud CRD.
> There are a few other things it does, such as create a ServiceAccount if
> one is requested, but it does not do anything with regard to collections.
> You likely won't see anything regarding collection management for a long
> time (if at all) in the Solr Operator.
> >> >
> >> > Though collection management and replica placement are something
> everyone deals with, so I'm sure people would be interested if you wanted
> to share. (Probably in a separate thread though)
> >> >
> >> > - Houston
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 2:14 PM Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I was curious about the "Solr helm chart" that Houston mentioned? I
> ask because I'm knee deep in a set of python scripts that create Solr
> Collections using the Solr operator. I just wanted make sure I'm not
> missing some Solr collection level support coming out.
> >> >>
> >> >> Also if anyone is interested I can share the python scripts I'm
> working on when they are ready next week. The scripts handle replica
> placement directly rather than relying on Solr for placement.
> >> >>
> >> >> Joel Bernstein
> >> >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:18 AM Timothy Potter <
> thelabd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Sounds good Houston! Thanks for initiating this process ;-) On my
> >> >>> side, I'd like to get fixes in for:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/291
> >> >>> https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/289
> >> >>> https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/274
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Should have PR's ready for review for these by the end of this week.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Cheers,
> >> >>> Tim
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 9:14 AM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Hello everyone,
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > As you might have seen on various lists, there is has been a lot
> of good stuff going into the Solr Operator recently. This includes:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > A Solr helm chart!
> >> >>> > Scheduled restarts
> >> >>> > More Provided Zookeeper options
> >> >>> > Customization of Service Account (Allows for running on OKD)
> >> >>> > More TLS options, such as common-endpoint ingress termination and
> mounted cert options
> >> >>> > A Solr Operator base image with no CVEs
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > There are still some features that folks are trying to get in, so
> I suggest that we have start a feature freeze in two weeks, on August 4.
> Then we can start the v0.4.0 release process, which should hopefully go
> very smoothly given the automation around it!
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Let me know if anyone has larger features that will require more
> time to get in.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Note: we will likely not be changing the supported Kubernetes
> version in this release. We may need another v0.5.0 release, not-so-long
> after v0.4.0, that supports Kubernetes v1.22, but we can cross that bridge
> when we get to it.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > - Houston
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to