Hello
Separator "_" would match ordinary SMX bundles versioning, so it's
consistent.
One thing that comes to my mind is that now (e.g., in Karaf's pom.xml) we
have:
<properties>
<servicemix.specs.version>2.9.0</servicemix.specs.version>
</properties>
That has to change. But I can imagine it's still much easier than releasing
all specs when only one is needed.
best regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
2018-01-04 19:57 GMT+01:00 Daniel Kulp <[email protected]>:
> Yea… using the “_” separator would work. We couldn’t do a “.”, but a
> separator could work to denote the “version” from servicemix.
>
> Dan
>
> > On Jan 4, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > That could work but we need to extend the version with a specific
> iteration.
> >
> > For instance servicemix-specs-jaxrs-api-2.1 could be
> servicemix-specs-jaxrs-api-2.1_1 (for instance, we can imagine to have a
> new fix/builds on the same spec version). It's the same format as in the
> bundles.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 01/04/2018 05:26 PM, Francois Papon wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I think it's a very good idea.
> >> Just for my curiosity, why not use the specification version in the
> >> release ?
> >> For example, in servicemix-specs-2.9.0, the jaxrs-api version is 2.1,
> >> may be it would be easier to check if the new release will be
> >> servicemix-specs-jaxrs-api-2.1 ?
> >> And to release a fix version we could add a last number in the version.
> >> François
> >> Le 04/01/2018 à 19:49, Daniel Kulp a écrit :
> >>> I definitely agree with this. The last thing I needed from specs
> was JUST a new jax-rs bundle so I did just do a release of just that
> bundle. However, with the build setup for monolithic releases, it was
> harder than it should be. It would be great to get the poms and such
> setup so we could just release the individual specs that change.
> >>>
> >>> One question would be around version number - the last “full release”
> was 2.9.0. For updates to current specs, do we jump to 3.0? For brand
> new specs, would we start at 3.0 or start at 1.0 like we do in bundles?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Jan 4, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>
> >>>> Up to now, we did monolithic ServiceMix Spec release (all spec in a
> row).
> >>>>
> >>>> As the spec are very stable, it's really painful to do a full specs
> release when a did a minor update or fix on a single spec.
> >>>>
> >>>> As we do for the bundles, I propose to change ServiceMix Specs in
> order to be able to release atomic spec.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts ?
> >>>>
> >>>> If you agree, I will prepare the change.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> JB
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > [email protected]
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>
