+1 on JB's roadmap :)

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
>
> Karaf 2.3.x is in EOL (it means that we still accept bug fixes, but it's not
> our high active/priority branch). So it makes sense that SMX 5.2.x also move
> to EOL.
>
> Now that Karaf 4 is out, Karaf 3 is in maintenance, Karaf 4 (master) is our
> active branch.
>
> So, I would propose to set SMX 5.2.x/5.3.x in end of life, and focus on SMX
> 6 and prepare SMX to be powered on Karaf 4 (I plan to work on that with
> Krzysztof).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 10/14/2015 10:22 AM, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> We have some old branches which we still maintain. I mean the old stable
>> 5.1.x (Karaf 2.3.x, Camel 2.13.x) and the both transition branches 5.2.x
>> (Karaf 2.3.x, Camel 2.14.x)
>> and 5.3.x (Karaf 2.4.x, Camel 2.13.x). More details here
>> http://servicemix.apache.org/community/releases-schedule.html. Do you think
>> we can transit them into EOL and
>> perform the further upgrades only on demand? I could eventually do the
>> last release from 5.3.x, because we have there some changes which have not
>> been released yet.
>>
>> Regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to