+1 to make all comitters + mentors part of the PMC, unless they opt out. Colm.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Ramesh Mani <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > I shall update the Apache Ranger Summary report based on the response I > get in private list. > > Thanks, > Ramesh > > > On 12/1/16, 1:00 PM, "Selvamohan Neethiraj" <[email protected] on > behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > >+1 > > > >If anyone wishes to be out of the PMC (during TLP process), they can send > >out an email to private list. > > > >Thanks, > >Selva- > > > >From: Balaji Ganesan <[email protected]> > >Reply-To: "[email protected]" > ><[email protected]> > >Date: Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 3:53 PM > >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: To discuss on Apache Ranger PMCs > > > >We could include all members (Committer, Mentor) as PMC, unless the member > >has a specific objection not to be part of PMC. Any pitfalls with this > >approach ? > > > >On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Ramesh Mani <[email protected]> > >wrote: > > > > Hello Rangers, > > > > As part of Ranger TLP preparation I need to provide the number of PMCs > > going to be part of Apache Ranger TLP and currently I have included all > >the > > Ranger PPMCs . But there was ask from Mentors to discuss on whether to > > include all the podling members found in Apache Ranger podling > > http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html or only PPMCs are fine. > > > > Could you please provide your opinion on this. Thanks all for your > > participation. > > > > Regards, > > Ramesh > > > > > > > > > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
