Thanks for sharing the report draft with dev@. It looks pretty good. As a mentor, I’d like to see some mention of how the pulsar PPMC plans to address the branding issues raised on private@. I feel pulsar is doing very well in terms of releases, etc., but falling painfully short in terms of adhering to branding guidelines [1][2].
-Taylor [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html> [2] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs <https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs> > On Jun 6, 2018, at 11:57 AM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here is the draft for the podling report. Please submit feedback soon, the > deadline is today (sorry for sending draft at last moment). > > > ------------ > > Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on > commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics, > guaranteed at-least-once delivery of messages, automatic cursor management > for > subscribers, and cross-datacenter replication. > > Pulsar has been incubating since 2017-06-01. > > Most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > 1. Complete the Podling name search tasks. The task is in progress right > now. > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware > of? > > None > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > The community added 7 new contributors that submitted pull-requests which > were merged into master. > > The number of users approaching the team on the Slack channel has kept > steadily increasing since the last report. Many users have actively > deployed > Pulsar for evaluation and production use cases. > > Project members from several companies have organized or participated in > several meetups, presenting Pulsar's introductions, deep-dives and > hands-on > tutorial, including recorded podcasts. We have several scheduled talks on > Pulsar at various conferences, 2 at ApacheCon in September, one at OSCon > in > July and 2 others at Strata New York in September. A Pulsar dedicated > meetup > is being organized for next July. > > Since the last report the number of weekly-active-users on the Slack > channel > has increased from 53 to 88. > > We have reached the 1 year mark since Pulsar entering the Apache > Incubator. > Here is a summary of the community developments over the past year: > > > 1. Pulsar community has done 5 Apache releases since entering > incubator. The release process is well documented and we have > had 4 different release managers from 3 different companies. > > 2. We have added 3 committers and PPMC members since incubation and > there are also other candidates who have already made significant > contributions to the project. > > 3. Community of users and people interested in Pulsar has expanded > considerably. Thanks to the months long work in improving ease of > use, documentation and blogs, many people became aware of Pulsar > and started playing with it, then evaluating it and finally > putting it in production for critical use cases. > > 4. We have tried to help users getting started through any > communication channel. Even though we keep trying to encourage > people to use the mailing list, most of the first interactions > have been happening through the Slack channel. We also did make > sure that: > > a) No decisions are taken in Slack channel > > b) Developers technical discussion happen mostly in Github > issue/Pull-Request or in developers mailing list > > c) Conversations in Slack are sent to dev/user mailing list in a > daily digest form for archival and to be searchable > > In any case Slack has been working fairly well in engaging with > users, by providing a tool to have very quick informal > question/answer interactions that were very appreciated by users. > > 5. Overall, there were a lot of healthy discussions, with feedback > and collaborations from people from different companies and > different perspectives that resulted in much stronger design > decisions and ultimately a better system. > > 6. We have taken several steps to increase awareness, like blog > posts, meetups (both dedicated to Pulsar or dedicated to similar > topics) and presentations to conferences, like Strata or > ApacheCon (where we have 2 talks scheduled for next September). > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > 23 authors have pushed 469 commits to master in the last 3 months. > > The project has made the its fifth release since joining the > Apache Incubator (2.0.0-rc1-incubating on May 29th). This was a > major release that culminated several months of works and lays the > foundation for the next stage in Pulsar development. New major > features include: > * Pulsar Functions (Lightweight compute framework) > * Schema registry > * Topic compaction > > Community is actively working on next milestone, 2.1 release that > will include several new features including: > * Pulsar IO connector framework > * Tiered storage > * Go client library > > Since March, 3 new PIPs (Pulsar Improvement Proposals) for major > feature/changes, have been submitted to the wiki and discussed in the > mailing list. > > To recap the project developments since entering Apache Incubator: > > 1. Moved to Apache BookKeeper 4.7. Before Pulsar 2.0, we were using > a fork of BookKeeper from Yahoo, based on 4.3.1 with 245 > additional commits. Thanks to a a big effort in the BookKeeper > community (which has a large overlap with Pulsar community), all > these changed were merged back into mainstream BookKeeper branch > and released in BookKeeper 4.7.0, making possible for Pulsar to > switch over from the Yahoo fork. > > 2. We have received a lot of feedback from people approaching Pulsar > and learned a lot on how to simplify tools, documentation and > concepts to make it easier for people to get started. > > 3. Based on the same feedback and inputs, we have been adding new > features or extended existing features to match a new variety of > use case, some of them outside the scope the initial Pulsar > codebase from Yahoo. > > To summarize the "major" features added in the last year: > > - Pulsar stateless proxy > - Non-persistent topics > - End-to-End message encryption > - Effectively-once semantics > - Type-safe APIs > - Schema Registry > - Pulsar Functions > - Topic compaction > - Python client library > > With more scheduled for next upcoming release 2.1: > > - Pulsar IO connector framework > - Tiered storage > - Go client library > > 4. In addition to features, we have been trying to smooth the > deployment of a production ready Pulsar cluster, by improving the > documentation and providing templates for more common environments, > such as Kubernetes, DCOS or just plain VMs with Ansible. > > 5. Having exposure to many users testing and using the sytem outside > the original Yahoo use cases has proven very effecting in helping > identifying and resolving corner cases that were not being > stressed before. This resulted in a much resilient system that > can adapt better to a large array of different requirements and > environments. > > > How would you assess the podling's maturity? > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > [ ] Initial setup > [ ] Working towards first release > [ ] Community building > [X] Nearing graduation > [ ] Other: > > Date of last release: > 2018-05-29, 2.0.0-rc1-incubating > > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > 2018-05-28 - Jerry Peng > 2018-05-28 - Sanjeev Kulkarni > > > > > > -- > Matteo Merli > <[email protected]>
