I've changed the namespace for all repos marked "official" except for
Universal Recommender and is running integration tests on them.

Also, I believe the sbt plugin for pio-build needs to be updated.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Let me know if anything is missing: https://issues.
> apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-24
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 12:26 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Donald Szeto <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 1) I’ll volunteer to take a couple templates and put them in their own
>> repos if we can get some created.
>>
> Sure. I believe Chan might have some converted repos as well.
>
>
>
>> 2) do we have a gallery page yet? we had a good proposal, is it
>> implemented?
>>
> It's already been merged in develop. Once we release the old template
> gallery will become a redirection to the new static page.
>
>
> This is needed only for historical reasons, right? The big blue Template
> button will go there directly after release, I assume.
>
>
>
>> 3) What templates are worth inclusion? Seems like some of the ALS
>> recommender ones are supersets of others do we need them all?
>>
> We should start with a core set of templates and one or a couple that
> focuses on a use case (since they are popular): vanilla, recommendation
> (both Scala and Java), similar product, classification, e-commerce, and
> text classification.
>
>
> sounds good, that is 7. @chan have you scrubbed any of these?
>
>
>
>> 4) do we need “release” of these except through Apache git and Github?
>> Since they are all built by users I suspect the normal Apache release
>> process can be avoided for them, the full push to maven, binary hosting,
>> etc.
>>
> I vote for maintaining the above set of templates to be at least working
> and passing integration tests for the main release. They do not necessarily
> go into the final binary distribution, but they should all be tagged and
> tested against with every release of PredictionIO.
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
>> 5) We need someone to file Infra Jira’s to get repos. If someone can
>> coach me on this I will do it.
>>
> My guess is we can just file an infrastructure ticket to spawn some
> discussion.
>
>
>
> Who did the original request for repo? Can someone point me to the Jira,
> I’ll take it from there
>
>
>> This might only add a week or so to the release date. If we don’t do it I
>> bet it will be much more time spent in support and fixing later.
>>
> Agree. If we all agree let's make this the final major thing to do before
> 0.10.0 release to avoid feature creep.
>
>
> +1, with the possible exception of fixing install.sh https://issues.
> apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-22 One option is to remove it from the
> release, which I favor, discussion on the jira.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to