Hi Yufei, That's a good suggestion - I’m open to merging them. That said, since we already have a dedicated and well-established sync for Authorization, it might be better to use the Community Sprint for other topics and help create structure around those discussions.
I’m fine either way. Happy to align with what works best for the group. Sung On 2026/04/06 17:59:32 Yufei Gu wrote: > Hi folks, > > We have a Polaris Community Spring tomorrow afternoon. Can we merge the > morning's Polaris Authorizer Sync Meeting into the Sprint? > > Yufei > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 11:30 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Sung, > > > > Thanks for driving this call! I think today's session was very useful and > > productive. > > > > Just to sync up with everyone: I believe we will continue working on code > > refactorings (SPI PRs) between those community calls and discuss > > specific code-level issues via email or GH comments. > > > > Cheers, > > Dmitri. > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 8:23 AM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks a lot JB! > > > > > > Confirming that I'm able to see the new recurring sync on my Google > > > calendar. > > > > > > I'm looking forward to syncing up with everyone tomorrow at 1pm ET / 10am > > > PT. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Sung > > > > > > On 2026/03/23 09:55:47 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > The invite has been sent. Anyone member of the Polaris Google Group > > will > > > > receive it. > > > > > > > > Here's the invite details: > > > > > > > > Polaris Authorizer Sync Meeting > > > > 10am PT > > > > Video call link: https://meet.google.com/hyj-fcdm-ydx > > > > > > > > NB: I'm creating a Calendar that will create a PR to share on the > > > website. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > JB > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 10:51 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Sung, > > > > > > > > > > I propose moving the sync to 10:00 AM PT (starting March 24th) to > > > avoid a > > > > > conflict with the Iceberg meeting. > > > > > > > > > > I am sending the calendar invitation now. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 12:52 AM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hi JB, that'll be fantastic. > > > > >> > > > > >> It looks like we have enough members interested in joining the sync. > > > > >> > > > > >> Could I ask for your help in adding a meeting to the Polaris Agenda > > > group > > > > >> [1], for Tuesdays at 12:00 PM ET (9:00 AM PT), starting March 24th? > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks a lot JB. And here's the Google Doc [2] I created where we > > can > > > > >> keep track of the discussion topics for the sync as well. > > > > >> > > > > >> Looking forward to discussing auth with everyone. > > > > >> > > > > >> Sung > > > > >> > > > > >> [1] https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/polaris-community-sync > > > > >> [2] > > > > >> > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C_SSaZH1i83UUGXrnVBur1fR_FHKYWZ75ISFfcb3kns/edit?tab=t.0 > > > > >> > > > > >> On 2026/03/20 14:15:40 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > >> > Hi > > > > >> > > > > > >> > As discussed together, I think it's a great idea. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I'm happy to add a meeting (recorded) on the Polaris agenda > > (Google > > > > >> Group). > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On a related topic, I will create a PR to add a Calendar with all > > > our > > > > >> > meetings on our website. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Regards > > > > >> > JB > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 7:30 PM Sung Yun <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Hi folks, > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Following the discussion in the Polaris community sync, it seems > > > like > > > > >> we > > > > >> > > could benefit from a dedicated forum to work through the > > > > >> PolarisAuthorizer > > > > >> > > SPI and related questions. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Some topics we can start with include: > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > - Decoupling Polaris resolution and privilege from Polaris > > > > >> authorization > > > > >> > > - Mixed-mode authorization (continuing to use native principals > > > and > > > > >> grants > > > > >> > > after decoupling) > > > > >> > > - Contract with external authorizers for Polaris (e.g., > > > > >> > > PolarisAuthorizableOperation, PolarisEntityType) > > > > >> > > - Incorporating additional authorization context > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > I’d like to propose a fortnightly authorization sync to drive > > > these > > > > >> topics > > > > >> > > forward. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > I’m thinking Tuesdays at 12:00 PM ET (9:00 AM PT), starting > > March > > > 25 > > > > >> (the > > > > >> > > second sequence will be April 7th, and on). I’m happy to send > > out > > > a > > > > >> > > calendar invite if there is general support in the community on > > > the > > > > >> idea. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Cheers, > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Sung > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
