+1 on the dedicated discussion. Next Tuesday at 9 a.m. works for me. Yufei
On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 3:02 PM Dennis Huo <[email protected]> wrote: > +1, those are some juicy topics that we need to work through sooner rather > than later > > Tues 12 ET works for me as well. > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 2:59 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Sung, > > > > Good idea. I think a dedicated sync call for AuthZ work will be very > > beneficial... at least for a few rounds. > > > > Tue 12:00 ET works for me. > > > > Cheers, > > Dmitri. > > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 3:57 PM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Correction: Tuesday, March 24th is the proposed starting day of this > > > fortnightly sync :) > > > > > > Let me know your thoughts. > > > > > > Sung > > > > > > On 2026/03/19 18:29:52 Sung Yun wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > Following the discussion in the Polaris community sync, it seems like > > we > > > > could benefit from a dedicated forum to work through the > > > PolarisAuthorizer > > > > SPI and related questions. > > > > > > > > Some topics we can start with include: > > > > > > > > - Decoupling Polaris resolution and privilege from Polaris > > authorization > > > > - Mixed-mode authorization (continuing to use native principals and > > > grants > > > > after decoupling) > > > > - Contract with external authorizers for Polaris (e.g., > > > > PolarisAuthorizableOperation, PolarisEntityType) > > > > - Incorporating additional authorization context > > > > > > > > I’d like to propose a fortnightly authorization sync to drive these > > > topics > > > > forward. > > > > > > > > I’m thinking Tuesdays at 12:00 PM ET (9:00 AM PT), starting March 25 > > (the > > > > second sequence will be April 7th, and on). I’m happy to send out a > > > > calendar invite if there is general support in the community on the > > idea. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Sung > > > > > > > > > >
