Hey Henrik,

Welcome back! This was an awesome presentation :) Thanks for sharing slides
and the recording!

Continuous Benchmarking sounds fine for me, I don't mind changing the term
if folks find it more intuitive. I also wonder if we should add a section
to the website with relevant publications and conference talks.

Best,
Alex

On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 2:32 PM Henrik Ingo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi everyone
>
> Sorry for dropping off the grid for several past weeks. I got selected to
> talk about Continuous Benchmarking at Fosdem a week ago. Preparing the talk
> was a lot of work, and also releasing some software that is mentioned in
> the talk, so that it  exits when I talk about it, was even more work. So
> I've been a bit in caveman mode since December, but slowly coming back to
> normal mode now.
>
> A big part of the talk of course is Change Point Detection. Video and
> slides are here if you're interested:
>
> https://blog.nyrkio.com/2026/02/10/continuous-benchmarking-howto-talk-at-fosdem-2026/
>
> In preparing the talk I came to the conclusion that people are gravitating
> around the term "Continuous Benchmarking", where I have previously used
> "Continuous Performance Engineering". The latter is also used on
> otava.apache.org and README, so this is just a "note to self" that at some
> point we may want to join the "Continuous Benchmarking" folks.
>
> Important milestone for a movement to at least agree on what it is going to
> call itself :-)
>
>
> I'll start replying to things and reviewing PRs which are waiting for me,
> but wanted to send this kind of generic message that I'm alive and feel
> free to ping me directly if you want me to focus on some specific PR or
> question first.
>
> henrik
> --
> *nyrkio.com <http://nyrkio.com/>* ~ *git blame for performance*
>
> Henrik Ingo, CEO
> [email protected]                               LinkedIn:
> www.linkedin.com/in/heingo
> +358 40 569 7354                                 Twitter:
> twitter.com/h_ingo
>

Reply via email to