Yes, and the detail is subtle. Needless to say, when looking into ODF-1.3 there were some issues that made us somewhat in error regarding 1.2/1.2-extended. So the goal was to completely reverify us against that standard and use that as the starting point for 1.3/1.3-extended.
> On Oct 29, 2026, at 5:30 PM, Pedro Lino via dev <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Jim > > Do you mean support 1.3 and push on to 1.4? > Branch 4.1 already saves to ODF 1.2 Extended by default > > Unless I am missing some technical detail? > > And yes, it would be great to at least support ODF 1.3 and get rid of the > warning each time you open an ODF from other Office Suites. > > All the best, > Pedro > >> On 10/29/2026 8:12 PM WET Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> With the push for AOO50X, one big topic would be ODF 1.2/1.3 support and >> 'compliance'. To that end, I've been working on getting `trunk` in ODF-1.2 >> worthy shape and am at the home stretch. To that end, I have a branch, >> called `odf-devel` which includes all the changes and a DRAFT >> to-be-published report: >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/odf-devel/odf_docs/ODF12-IMPLEMENTATION-DEFINED-PUBLIC.md >> >> After 1.2, I will push on to 1.3. >> >> -- >> Jim >> "This is an outrage!" >> Tony Harrison > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- Jim "This is an outrage!" Tony Harrison
