Hi Rory

> > I believe it would have more impact (and still be correct) if you replaced 
> > it with
> > 
> > "the software reads all current file types of major competitors."
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> 
> My reasoning for the earlier wording which I suggested is that many users, 
> becoming more and more inexperienced, expect every file to open with 
> OpenOffice; they take it as a personal insult when a file does not open, for 
> whatever reason. I prefer the slight ambiguity of "most".

That is why I suggest "file types". I understand that users expect OpenOffice 
to open every file. But I also expect my "old" Office 2016 to open every 
Microsoft OOXML file correctly and it does not...
Should we give up on educating users because they feel insulted? Should we not 
insist on Open Document because most users want to keep using Microsoft file 
formats?

Regards,
Pedro

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to