On 7/9/2017 12:13 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 09.07.2017 um 14:53 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: >> [...] >> >> Anyway I am proceeding with (uncommitted) development under the >> assumption >> at least 7 is ok, and will revisit with 8 if possible. Please object soon >> if you do :-) > > of course the current 4.1.x release line should be kept as it is. > > If possible - also together with other ports like OS/2 or Solaris - you > can try to update trunk to Java 8. Otherwise it's Java 7 we can go. > > My 2 ct. > > Marcus I agree with Marcus that the 4.1.x line needs to remain as is. 4.2.x would be the earliest version that this type of change makes sense.
Keith
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
