> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:[email protected]]
> Here are some of mine. I am sure others differ. > > (1) investigate and fix security holes. +1 > (2) frequent releases. +-0 or -1 In practice, a time interval of 12-15 months would be sufficient. Note: the release cycle of LO is much too short, even if this is always presented as an advantage. I could write "imho", but the truth is that the one is a tangible practice problem for professional office users. Because I offer commercial support for OO and LO, I know what I'm talking about. > (3) near one to one conversion to and from Microsoft Office. +-0 Do you know the story of the hare and the hedgehog? http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/grimm187.html Yes, the users want that, but would not it be right and honest to tell the users: 'if you want MS Office, then use MS Office and not OO' > (4) deconflicted feature requests. I do not know what you mean specifically with "deconflicted". > What do people think? I think _in the present situation_ it is better to work more and to discuss less. I am unfortunately not a programmer of OO, but I support the project with user support, as a member of the project www.prooo-box.org and as a moderator in the forum http://openoffice.org. I have regularly supported the project through translations of the release notes into the German language. greetings, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
