On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 06/26/2015 08:33 PM, schrieb Simon Phipps: > >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Marcus<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Am 06/26/2015 06:27 PM, schrieb Simon Phipps: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Rory O'Farrell<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:25:01 +0100 >>>> >>>>> Simon Phipps<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Rory, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Rory O'Farrell<[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been updated >>>>>> in a >>>>>> >>>>>>> long time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which ones are you referring to? The ones at >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/timeline >>>>> >>>>> or something else? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> Simon >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I was thinking of the ones linked off >>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/index.html >>>>> in particular of >>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ah yes, those are ancient. It would probably be better to just make >>>>> the >>>>> >>>> page a redirect to >>>> >>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/timeline >>>> >>>> >>> ... or you could start to be productive and update the numbers. ;-) >>> >> >> It would be better to avoid having content on the web site that requires >> regular manual updates, hence the recommendation that the page be >> converted >> to a redirect. >> > > maybe, but why don't you try to reach this goal? What is strange is that > you write here only what has to (or should) be done. Nothing strange. I do not have commit access, and it's a trivial change for someone who does. If I did have commit access I would be right on it like I have been on other occasions, you betcha :-) S.
