On 27 October 2013 11:53, imacat <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for taking care of this. People are asking this on Wiki and
> forum (and even WWW) for long. And I know a wild card certificate is
> very costly.
>
Thanks for your kind words.
In all this discussion about www, please do NOT forget to test
https://wiki.openoffice.org
next weekend http://wiki.openoffice.org will be changed to a redirect to
https://wiki.openoffice.org and thereby all traffic will be https:
At the same time:
https://forum.openoffice.org
will be made available for test, and a week later
http://forum.openoffice.org will be changed to a redirect to
https://forum.openoffice.org and thereby all traffic will be https:
I have already now seen references to http:// this need to be changed,
otherwise users will get a warning.
rgds
jan I.
> On 2013/10/27 16:05, janI said:
> > On 27 October 2013 02:58, Ariel Constenla-Haile <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:30:06PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:54:59PM +0200, janI wrote:
> >>>>> Hi.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> www.openoffice.org now accept both http: and https: as announced
> >>>>> earlier.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have however seen that e.g. product.css contain image tag with
> >>>>> http://xxx. All references must be relative (without http: and
> >>>>> https:). I hope the web admins can do make the needed changes.
> >>>>
> >>>> There are 26,349 matches of "http://www.openoffice.org/"; in
> >>>> ooo-site.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> We *are not* going to change to a system that requires that links to
> >>> www.openoffice.org are all https. I hope that is not what is being
> >>> suggested. Remember, we have 10's of thousands of *external* links to
> >>> our website that we do control and cannot change.
> >>>
> >>> Please someone, tell me that this is not what is being suggested here.
> >>
> >
> > No its not, as I wrote in the part you quote, www.openoffice.org will
> > continue to have https: but also https: as pr request from the project.
> >
> > But if I might remind you sent a mail to infra, asking why https: was not
> > implemented for www.openoffice.org, which I and pctony responded to.
> >
> > And if you look at INFRA-6608, you will see a comment from andrea 3
> August:
> > "And we will want to use it, even though there is no authentication
> there,
> > for
> > http(s)://www.openoffice.org
> > (this is mainly because we receive a steady, even if low, amount of
> > complaints from users who cannot browse our main site on HTTPS). "
> >
> >
> > We infra have done exactly as the project asked us to do according to
> > INFRA-6608, and that is not correct ??
> >
> > I actually never understood why https: was wanted on www.openoffice.org,
> > but it was not a problem to do it, so it was done.
> >
> > today is a day where I am less proud of being AOO-PMC. We (AOO) have
> been
> > after infra to get a certificate and get it implemented. Yesterday mark
> > took a big chunk of time and with some help from me, got it implemented.
> I
> > think infra should have a "thank you", instead !
> >
> >
> > I have of course a double heart in this situation, but I am sure this is
> > not a good way, to work together.
> >
> > rgds
> > jan I.
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> were you have href="http://www.openoffice.org/some_resource";, it should
> >> be href="/some_resource" (nothing crazy, but a good practice).
> >>
> >> Grepping href=["']http://www.openoffice.org/ gives 25,026 matches.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> --
> >> Ariel Constenla-Haile
> >> La Plata, Argentina
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> imacat ^_*' <[email protected]>
> PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
>
> <<Woman's Voice>> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
> Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
> Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
> OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
> EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
> Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/
>
>
