On 23 December 2012 21:29, Keith N. McKenna <[email protected]>wrote:
> janI wrote: > >> On 23 December 2012 19:31, Keith N. McKenna <[email protected]>** >> wrote: >> >> Keith N. McKenna wrote: >>> >>> Based on extended discussions on this list at: >>>> http://markmail.org/search/+****list:org.apache.incubator.ooo-****<http://markmail.org/search/+**list:org.apache.incubator.ooo-**> >>>> dev#query:%20list%3Aorg.****apache.incubator.ooo-dev+page:**** >>>> 1+mid:pkyogj4m45anxuxg+state:****results<http://markmail.org/** >>>> search/+list:org.apache.**incubator.ooo-dev#query:%** >>>> 20list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.**ooo-dev+page:1+mid:** >>>> pkyogj4m45anxuxg+state:results<http://markmail.org/search/+list:org.apache.incubator.ooo-dev#query:%20list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.ooo-dev+page:1+mid:pkyogj4m45anxuxg+state:results> >>>> **> >>>> >>>> . >>>> I propose to start merging and updating the User FAQ's from the website >>>> into the current structure on the mediawiki (mwiki) and updating the >>>> FAQ's already there by eliminating outdated references to version 1 and >>>> version 2 and any duplications. >>>> >>>> If there are no objections in 72 hours I will start merging the entries >>>> from the website into the mwiki. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Keith N. Mckenna >>>> >>>> >>>> Good day all; >>>> >>> >>> Just a quick update to where this mini-project is. I have jut about >>> finished all the modifications to the faqtoc on the mwiki. This is being >>> done through a copy of the template file so as to avoid multiple saves to >>> the template bringing the mwiki to its knees. Once the copy is finalized >>> the changes will be made to the actual template file and saved once. >>> Though >>> tj has told me there should be no major performance hit by doing this I >>> will schedule it probably over a weekend when usage is lower to >>> (hopefully) >>> minimize the hurt when Murphy inevitably bites. >>> >>> I agree with tj, that is not a major burden for the mysql. Please be >> aware >> that I am looking at moving wikitest to production before end of the >> year...so please send me an e-mail directly, when you want to start >> working, then I keep my hands off. >> >> Jan I. >> >> Jan; > > In my earlier discussions with tj his feeling was that what I will be > doing should not have any effect on the upgrade procedures. As long as the > underlying data structure remains with all of it's associations and links > to categories there should not be a problem. As I told tj previously, I am > a process engineer and spent most of career in manufacturing. One tends to > develop a cautious and conservative approach when knowing that it is you > who has to explain to the operations manager and the plant manager why > there production line is sitting idle. <lol> I have been bitten by Murphy > in ways that I had never imagined and I am sure he has more waiting in the > wings or me. > > It will not affect the upgrade, as long as you do it either before or after I upgrade...if you it after I have made a backup of the db we might have problems, so lets avoid that. When you want to do all your template stuff, give me an advance notice, and I will not start the upgrade (or if I am in the middle tell you). > If it would be easier to do the rest of the development work on the test > part I have no problem doing that. We need the software update and the > clean-up work desperately and I do not want to interfere with that work in > any way. > No, then I would have to merge the databases....but if there is something you want to test before adding it to production, please feel free to do so on the test system, that is the purpose of it !!! BUT all changes must be done in the live wiki. At the moment I wait for the deletion of at least half of the unused images, so the backup becomes manageable :-) > >>> I came across the following page >>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/****wiki/FAQ<http://wiki.openoffice.org/**wiki/FAQ> >>> <http://wiki.**openoffice.org/wiki/FAQ<http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/FAQ>>that >>> appears to be a sandbox that was started for developer FAQ's and then >>> >>> abandoned. There has been no development activity on it since 2009. Since >>> many of the faq's on the web site are aimed towards developers, I would >>> like to use this page as an index page for a number of different >>> categories >>> of developer faq's. I someone with a better knowledge and background in >>> development could take a look at the page and if there is anything worth >>> keeping let me know. >>> >>> Regards >>> Keith >>> >>> >>> >> > >
