Pretty simple request... ;-) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Matthew Bishop <[email protected]> Date: Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:51 PM Subject: [serp:bugs] #6 Strings class should use StringBuilder, not StringBuffer To: Ticket 6 <[email protected]>
------------------------------ * [bugs:#6] <http://sourceforge.net/p/serp/bugs/6> Strings class should use StringBuilder, not StringBuffer* *Status:* open *Group:* v1.0 (example) *Created:* Tue Sep 16, 2014 09:51 PM UTC by Matthew Bishop *Last Updated:* Tue Sep 16, 2014 09:51 PM UTC *Owner:* nobody Pretty straightforward request--use StringBuilder instead of StringBuffer; StringBuffer is synchronized, which is unnecessary in the Strings class. ------------------------------ Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/serp/bugs/6/ To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
