Hi, Paul.
Thank you!
We have to fix it in our pom.xml file.
Regards,
Sergey
01.06.2020 05:22, Paul King пишет:
Both are related to CoreNLP from what I can see:
$ mvn dependency:tree -Dincludes=com.io7m.xom:xom:jar:1.2.10 -Dverbose
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
[INFO] ------------------< org.apache.nlpcraft:java-client
-------------------
[INFO] Building NLPCraft - Java Client 0.5.0
[INFO] --------------------------------[ jar
]---------------------------------
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:2.8:tree (default-cli) @ java-client ---
[INFO] org.apache.nlpcraft:java-client:jar:0.5.0
[INFO] \- org.apache.nlpcraft:nlpcraft:jar:0.5.0:compile
[INFO] +- edu.stanford.nlp:stanford-corenlp:jar:3.9.2:compile
[INFO] | \- com.io7m.xom:xom:jar:1.2.10:compile
[INFO] \- edu.stanford.nlp:stanford-corenlp:jar:models:3.9.2:runtime
[INFO] \- (com.io7m.xom:xom:jar:1.2.10:runtime - omitted for
duplicate)
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 3.789 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2020-06-01T11:44:46+10:00
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I imagine just excluding transitive dependencies for the core project would
be enough:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.nlpcraft</groupId>
<artifactId>nlpcraft</artifactId>
<version>${nlpcraft.ver}</version>
* <exclusions> <exclusion>
<groupId>*</groupId> <artifactId>*</artifactId>
</exclusion> </exclusions>* </dependency>
It certainly builds fine still with that change but I don't have things set
up right now to properly run the test suite.
It seems to produce the same classes (but vastly different
META-INF/DEPENDENCIES file - for the better).
If someone with the server set up could enable and run the test suite that
would confirm things.
Cheers, Paul.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 10:43 AM Nikita Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
Gents,
Can someone shed some light on this? Where and how we are pulling these GPL
libraries? We definitely can't download these during "mvn clean package"...
Thank you,
--
Nikita Ivanov
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Justin Mclean <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, May 31, 2020 at 1:42 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (Incubating)
0.5.0
To: <[email protected]>
Hi,
-1 (binding)
Everything else looks fine but you may have GPL dependancies [1][2] Can you
confirm if this is or is not the case, and are these optional? [3]
I checked:
- incubating in names
- signatures and hashes are fine
- DISCLAIMER exits
- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have ASF headers
- Can compile from source
Thanks,
Justin
1 .http://xom.nu
2. https://stanfordnlp.github.io/CoreNLP/
3. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
