0.1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT about to be pushed.  Am testing it now

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Dan Bress <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with what Brandon said.  I think someone should run mvn versions:set 
> "0.1.0-SNAPSHOT" on develop, to make it clear what we are working towards 
> there.
>
> Brandon,  when you are writing your release/branch guide, consider mentioning 
> the mvn release:branch plugin.  I've used it in the past, and found it 
> helpful.  In short it will make a branch, and then run mvn versions:set on 
> the parent to set it to whatever the next version is.  We would only want to 
> use this to make the "release branches" that Brandon is talking about, not 
> feature branches.
>
> Dan Bress
> Software Engineer
> ONYX Consulting Services
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Brandon DeVries <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:02 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: bumping version to 0.1.0
>
> In this case to create a 0.0.3 we would probably want to create a branch
> from the 0.0.2 tag (possibly called something like "release-0.0").  When
> the 0.1.0 release is "ready" (and I'll try to get the documentation updated
> before that), the proposed model would be to create a "release-0.1" branch,
> test until comfortable, and then release 0.1.0 from that branch.  Then if
> 0.1.1 should become necessary, we continue working from the "release-0.1"
> branch, cherry picking from master as needed.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:30 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> With 0.0.2 behind us now we can start preperations for the next
>> planned release which is 0.1.0.  In it we can include the stuff Dan
>> Bress had planned and we can start folding in some of these things
>> which have been on branches.
>>
>> My git/git-flow foo isn't up to par to understand the right way that
>> we'd do an 0.0.3 if we had to.  But seems easy enough given the tag
>> and the fact that master is the view right after the release.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joe
>>

Reply via email to