Ok it is all in.  Starting RC build.  Please do not tag anything else to
1.19.  If necessary I'll pull things in.

1.20 has been established.

Thanks

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:51 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Gonna wait for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10857 as this
> was apparently made bigger and some tests broken from another 1.19 JIRA.
>
> Probably gonna kick out the RC tomorrow and then let the vote run through
> Monday.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 9:56 AM Mike Thomsen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Can someone do a quick review on this? I think it would be a nice
>> little bullet point on our release to say we added preliminary support
>> for Neo4J 5 since it's so new.
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6684
>>
>> (Enabling the V5 profile has a hard dependency on Java 17)
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:00 AM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Goodness.  Some pretty cool collaboration on things like the docker
>> updates
>> > and NiFi 1.19 is looking healthy.  Time permitting, I'd like to start
>> the
>> > RC today.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:16 PM Kevin Doran <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >  NIFI-10701 is merged. If folks are ok holding off a day or two more
>> for
>> > > 1.19, I'll look into following the work Ferenc Kis did for that to
>> knock
>> > > out NIFI-10820.
>> > >
>> > > On Nov 15, 2022 at 19:43:57, Matt Burgess <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Awesome, thanks all! I'd like to wait for Github actions to be happy
>> > > > and then merge?
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 7:11 PM Mark Bean <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > NIFI-10703 has been worked through. I think it's good to go now.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 4:43 PM Matt Burgess <[email protected]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > I can take that review too, if your suggestions are incorporated.
>> I
>> > > >
>> > > > > started looking the other day but didn't get to dig in. I'll try
>> to
>> > > >
>> > > > > reproduce in the meantime.
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > > Matt
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 4:42 PM Nathan Gough <[email protected]
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > We might also want
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10787
>> > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 4:05 PM Mark Bean <
>> [email protected]>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > I will be on it in about 2 hours, if not addressed sooner.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 3:46 PM Joe Witt <[email protected]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > NIFI-10703 would be great to get in.  Just a matter of
>> gettin' it
>> > > >
>> > > > > done
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > and
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > merged I think.  You're on it?
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 1:38 PM Mark Bean <
>> [email protected]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Sorry.. check that. There's a typo in the latest commit
>> on that
>> > > > PR.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 3:35 PM Mark Bean <
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Could we get NIFIDEVS-10703 (PR #6638) in there too?
>> AFAIK,
>> > > > it's
>> > > >
>> > > > > good
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > to
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > go.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Mark
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 2:56 PM Joe Witt <
>> [email protected]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> Hello All,
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> I plan to kick off the RC as soon as
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10701 is
>> merged.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:52 PM David Handermann <
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > Joe,
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > Thanks for initiating the discussion. I agree with
>> moving
>> > > >
>> > > > > toward a
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> 1.19.0
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > release instead of 1.18.1 given over 150 Jira issues
>> > > already
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > tagged
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > with
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > 1.19.0.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > We should start another thread soon regarding 2.0.
>> One of
>> > > > the
>> > > >
>> > > > > key
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> things to
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > do before that, however, would be to finish adding
>> > > > deprecation
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > logging
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> to
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > remaining features we plan to remove in 2.0. Having a
>> > > minor
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > release
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > in
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > version 1 series deprecating targets for removal
>> should
>> > > be a
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> prerequisite
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > before branching and starting on 2.0.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > In the meantime, if that means we plan on a 1.20.0
>> > > release,
>> > > > I
>> > > >
>> > > > > am
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > in
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> favor
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > of moving forward with 1.19.0.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > David Handermann
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 1:44 PM Joe Witt <
>> > > > [email protected]>
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > > Team,
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > > We keep getting a slew of emails on various lists,
>> > > slack,
>> > > >
>> > > > > and
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > security
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > > list about commons text.  We need a 1.18.1 or a
>> 1.19.0.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > > Given all that has already happened on 1.19.0 I'm
>> > > inclined
>> > > >
>> > > > > to
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > just
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > 'do
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > > that' release and get it going.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > > I know we need to start getting serious about 2.0
>> but
>> > > >
>> > > > > perhaps
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > most
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > > realistic path for that is we branch and come back
>> to
>> > > main
>> > > >
>> > > > > after
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > we
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> get
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > > that figured out.  But we need to keep moving
>> forward in
>> > > > the
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > meantime.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > > Please share if there is anything we know about on
>> the
>> > > > main
>> > > >
>> > > > > line
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > which
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > > would make doing a 1.19.0 problematic.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12352345
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > > Thanks
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>>
>

Reply via email to