I'm not sure if I understand this correctly. Trinidad-2 is for JSF-2 upwards exclusively, isn't?
If so, then we can easily get rid of all the old dust which just confuses people. Furthermore there seems to be a few compat problems with JSF-2 f:ajax which can only be resolved by carefully cleaning those areas up. Just leave behind the old stuff. LieGrue, strub >________________________________ >From: Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> >To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 1:06 PM >Subject: Re: [trinidad] cleanup > > >Well just because something is depth aged doesn't mean we can remove it. It >just means that an alternate means is suggested or something may not work >exactly as expected if used. > > >A Prime example is ExternalContextUtils. That guy has been around since JSF >1.1. It contains lots of functionality that wasn't present in later versions >of JSF, but now is. Use of the native objects should be encouraged, but there >is also something to be said about older code being able to migrate easier to >a later release. > > >Now I DO agree with removing the JSDoc and possibly the deprecations in the >impl, but I think it's important to keep any deprecations in the API for >backward compatibility. > >Sent from my iPhone > >On Oct 5, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> >wrote: > > >both - there are just two possibilities: those parts are really deprecated and >we remove them (and refactor the rest) or we can't remove them and the >information (annotation and/or javadoc) isn't correct. >> >> >>regards, >>gerhard >>http://www.irian.at >> >>Your JSF powerhouse - >>JSF Consulting, Development and >>Courses in English and German >> >>Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> >> >> >>2011/10/5 Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> >> >>Gerhard, by deprivation hints, I'm assuming you mean the javadoc deprecations >>and not the annotations, right? >>> >>>Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>On Oct 5, 2011, at 3:09 AM, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>>hi @ all, >>>> >>>> >>>>there are still over 400 deprecations (via @Deprecated) and nearly 400 via >>>>javadoc (not all of them overlap). >>>>a lot of them are in for a long time and some of them were deprecated even >>>>before [1]. >>>> >>>> >>>>however, some parts are still used and can't be removed. >>>> >>>> >>>>imo we should do a cleanup or remove the deprecation hints. >>>> >>>> >>>>regards, >>>>gerhard >>>> >>>> >>>>[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1229 >>>> >>>>http://www.irian.at >>>> >>>>Your JSF powerhouse - >>>>JSF Consulting, Development and >>>>Courses in English and German >>>> >>>>Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>>> >> > >
