+1 for a.) too :) LieGrue, strub
--- On Fri, 8/12/11, Jakob Korherr <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Jakob Korherr <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: jsdocs + build tools > To: "MyFaces Development" <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, August 12, 2011, 1:43 PM > Hi Werner, > > Great!! > > Frankly, I'd prefer a). > > Regards, > Jakob > > 2011/8/12 Werner Punz <[email protected]>: > > Hi Everyone > > > > Status update: I have a preliminary maven plugin up > and running which > > triggers jsdoc upon our javascript assembly.xml > information. > > I will refine the plugin and once good enough I will > merge it as preliminary > > version into our build tools in a few weeks. > > > > I started basically from scratch because I wanted it > to use our assembly > > information which we also use for compression. > > > > The question now is more along the lines since I start > the refinement phase. > > > > What do we want to do with the plugin. There are > several options: > > > > a) provide a separate jsdoc goal which generates the > jsdocs > > > > or > > > > b) generate the jsdocs in the same phase as our > javadocs and bundle the > > generated jsdocs along the javadocs. > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > -- > Jakob Korherr > > blog: http://www.jakobk.com > twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr > work: http://www.irian.at >
