Jepp makes a lot of sense
Am 04.07.11 10:34, schrieb Gerhard Petracek (JIRA):
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13059357#comment-13059357 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on EXTCDI-172: ----------------------------------------- we could provide something like: public class MyGroup{} @ConversationScoped @ConversationGroup(MyGroup.class) public class BeanA {} @ConversationScoped @ConversationGroup(MyGroup.class) public class BeanB {} @ConversationScoped @ConversationGroup(MyGroup.class) public class BeanC {} @ConversationSubGroup({BeanA.class, BeanB.class}) public class MySubGroup extends MyGroup {} //... this.windowContext.closeConversation(MySubGroup.class) //... -> only BeanA and BeanB will be un-scoped. the conversation as well as BeanC will continue to exist.sub-groups for conversation groups ---------------------------------- Key: EXTCDI-172 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-172 Project: MyFaces CODI Issue Type: New Feature Components: JEE-JSF12-Module, JEE-JSF20-Module Affects Versions: 1.0.0 Reporter: Gerhard Petracek Priority: Minor Fix For: 1.0.1 it should be possible to use sub-groups of conversation groups to allow an even more fine grained control. since it's a completely new concept we have to design it from scratch and check it it makes sense to introduce the overhead.-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
