Hi all,
With the Extval metadata provider addon, the developer has the possibility
to specify the packages that needs to be scanned for the @MetaDataProvider.
However, doing this, results in some performance penalty.
During initialization of the MetaDataProviderStorage class, it stores the
information in the property customMetaDataProviderStorage. This property is
not consulted (not immediately) when a metadata provider class is requested
from the storage. And the scanning is performed again in the method
getMetaDataProviderClassFor and now kept in metaDataProviderStorage
property.
As a side effect of keeping 2 properties, the result of the method is a list
that contains twice the metadata provider class. The doubles are handled
correctly in the
MetaDataProviderScanningInterceptor.createAdditionalMetaDataEntries and thus
only processed once (but instantiated twice)
The advanced metadata addon has the same 'defect'.
Possible solutions
1) keep the 2 properties (customMetaDataProviderStorage and
metaDataProviderStorage) but add following code just before the try in the
getMetaDataProviderClassFor method
* if(this.customMetaDataProviderStorage.containsKey(sourceClass))
{
return this.customMetaDataProviderStorage.get(sourceClass);
}*
although rewrite is a better option.
2) remove the 'double' storage property (remove the
customMetaDataProviderStorage) and the getMetaDataProviderClassFor method
could look like this:
* public List<Class> getMetaDataProviderClassFor(Class sourceClass)
{
if(this.metaDataProviderStorage.containsKey(sourceClass))
{
return this.metaDataProviderStorage.get(sourceClass);
}
try
{
for(Class foundProvider :
processTarget(sourceClass.getPackage().getName()))
{
addMetaDataProvider(sourceClass, foundProvider,
this.metaDataProviderStorage);
}
}
catch(Throwable t)
{
if(this.logger.isWarnEnabled())
{
this.logger.warn("unable to setup annotation based metadata
provider for " + sourceClass.getName(), t);
}
this.metaDataProviderStorage.put(sourceClass, null);
}
return this.metaDataProviderStorage.get(sourceClass);
}*
and use the metaDataProviderStorage in the constructor instead of the
removed property.
regards
Rudy