Hi 2009/6/18 Werner Punz <[email protected]>
> Component API still has one unimplemented method in UIComponent (I am > working on it as we speak, I will probably have it finished next week! - > you probably cann add the missing part to partial state saving though!) > I did some work related to that issue. I can do this point, so you can focus on javascript part and partial view code,(only if you want). regards Leonardo Uribe > > Werner > > > Leonardo Uribe schrieb: > >> Hi >> >> Just as a brief review, this is an updated list about the state of myfaces >> core 2.0.0 branch: >> >> Pending tasks >> >> - Facelets PDL >> - Client behavior API (depends from facelets and composite component >> stuff) >> - Error handling API (and run through existing classes to make sure the >> new exception specification is enforced) >> - Partial view API >> - Partial State Saving >> - Add Flash scope >> - New tags (mostly linked to Facelets) >> - Unit tests (conversion shale -> myfaces code) >> >> Done tasks (some parts maybe requires testing or minor updates) >> >> - Resource API >> - Annotation support >> - h:outputScript and h:outputStyleSheet renderer >> - Config ordering >> - JavaScript API >> - Tree visiting API >> - SystemEvent API >> - New validators (Bean and regex mainly) >> - Utility methods (ExternalContext mainly) (requires testing) >> >> regards >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2009/6/9 Leonardo Uribe <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> Hi >> >> Good to hear that facelets part will be committed soon. I hope to >> start working on javax.faces.behavior api and continue contribute on >> other parts of myfaces core 2.0 (for example implement partial state >> saving) as soon as tomahawk be released (planned on next week). >> >> regards >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2009/6/9 Simon Lessard <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> We use the Facelets codebase, we just have to rename the package >> (already done), use the HandlerDelegate ... thing ... and >> implement the Facelets VDL. Those are not part of "standard" >> Facelets with existing ASL 2.0 code. >> >> >> ~ Simon >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Ganesh<[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Facelets are apache 2.0 licensed, >> >> correct >> >> > why do we reinvent them? >> >> they added stuff for JSF 2.0 >> >> e.g. <composite:interface> etc >> (but didn't put it into the Apache licensed version) >> >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Ganesh >> > >> > Simon Lessard schrieb: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On my side I'll try to work and finish Facelets part >> within 2 weeks, fater >> >> than that is impossible for me atm. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> ~ Simon >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Werner Punz >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> <mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >> >> >> >> regarding tree visitor, this may help: >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1368 >> >> >> >> Thanks for the link, I will get it and compare it to >> what I have... >> >> I assume there wont be too much which I still can >> integrated in >> >> the PartialVisitContext since I am rather optimized >> already and >> >> bound by the spec! >> >> >> >> >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Werner >> >> Punz<[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Michael Concini schrieb: >> >> >> >> Wasn't there a plan to have some of the >> partial tree >> >> traversal work done >> >> as part of the Google Summer of Code? I >> seem to >> >> recall some discussion >> >> around this awhile back (don't have time >> to dig >> >> through the mailing list >> >> archives right now to check). Does >> anybody remember >> >> what the plan was with >> >> Google SoC? >> >> >> >> Interesting question, but I assume I only >> have a small >> >> subset of the needed >> >> functionality implemented, the one we need >> for PPR so, >> >> I will commit my tomorrow as soon as I have >> tested it, >> >> whoever wants to do >> >> something in GSOC can pick it up and refine >> it. But have >> >> in mind, my work >> >> currently only coveres the area of providing a >> >> PartialVisitContext so that I >> >> have a complete state for PPR in this area! >> >> If someone comes with a better solution I >> dont have any >> >> problem dropping the >> >> code again ;-) >> >> >> >> >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Werner Punz wrote: >> >> >> >> Michael Concini schrieb: >> >> >> >> All, >> >> >> >> I thought it might be a good time >> to raise the >> >> issue of solidifying a >> >> plan for the MyFaces 2.0 alpha >> release now >> >> that we've had a little time to >> >> work with the release candidate >> draft of the >> >> spec. What are the thoughts in >> >> the community with respect to >> what should be >> >> included in an alpha release as >> >> well as what the time frame >> should be for a >> >> release. If we can come up with >> >> a target date as well as specific >> 2.0 features >> >> we want to target for >> >> inclusion, that should help in >> prioritizing >> >> the remaining work. >> >> From my end, I'd love to see a >> working >> >> runtime in some form by the end >> >> of August if that's reasonable. >> As for >> >> content, that is definitely more of >> >> an open question. Here is my top >> list of what >> >> I would like to see be at >> >> least partially functional for an >> alpha release. >> >> -backwards compatibility with JSF >> 1.x apps >> >> -base support for facelets and >> composite >> >> components >> >> -AJAX support (should hopefully >> be in pretty >> >> good shape here thanks to >> >> Ganesh and team) >> >> -System event support >> >> -Partial view traversal >> >> >> >> Thoughts/concerns/objections? >> >> >> >> -Mike >> >> >> >> None from my side not sure how far >> Ganesh is with >> >> his ajax tag! >> >> The scripts already are in pretty >> good shape and >> >> functionalitywise well >> >> ahead of the RI ;-) >> >> >> >> As for partial Tree traversal minor >> sidequestion? >> >> Has anyone started to >> >> work on this, because I have started >> to implement >> >> the partial visit context >> >> (I have to recheck the jira for this, >> because I >> >> opened an issue for this >> >> under partial render response issue >> 2116/2241)! >> >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2241 >> >> >> >> I will commit my code around >> tomorrow, it is >> >> basically done >> >> but needs some testing! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> >> >> >
