+1 away from commons logging -1 force to use jul I would prefer slf4j because it's a logging facade similar to commons logging.
And I would like to use Mapped Diagnostic Context (MDC) support. Has jul a similar feature? Regards Bernd On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Andrew Robinson<[email protected]> wrote: > +0, I'd prefer slf4j as well. But, I am +1 of getting away from > commons logging as it has too many issues. > > -Andrew > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Werner Punz<[email protected]> wrote: >> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >> >>> For Trinidad, we keep our Trinidad logger (at least I am not chaning >>> that). >>> The TrinidadLogger is internally using JUL, for what's worth. So I think >>> we are fine with that, at least I hope... >>> >> I dont think anything has to be changed on the Trinidad side in this regard. >> The biggest reason for using jul was get rid of another dependency, if >> Trinidad has anothe meta logger on top of JUL I personally thing not a >> single line of code has to be changed. >> Just my 2c! >> >> >> Werner >> >> >
