hello, @archetypes for each library with facelets:
+1 and it would be nice to clean-up the existing demos or provide demos with a minimal config. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2009/4/22 Andrew Robinson <[email protected]> > It looks like most of the work is done with the existing archetypes. I > think what would be nice: > > Archetypes for each library (tomahawk, tobago, etc.) > Archetypes for each library with facelets (or just have comments in > the web.xml on how to convert the project to facelets) > > And then a different wiki with simplified instructions on using this > for a bug. (hard-coded artifact and group IDs and other command line > settings so that the user does not have to be asked anything). > > Then maybe there is a way in Jira when a new bug is being created to > point the user to the wiki page? Anyone know if this is possible? > > -Andrew > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Simon Lessard > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Definitely +1 > >> > >> ~ Simon > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> Just for information purposes and as start point, what we have right > now > >>> is this wiki page: > >>> > >>> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyFaces_Archetypes_for_Maven > >>> > >>> The archetypes available > >>> > >>> myfaces-archetype-helloworld // myfaces 1.2 + > tomahawk > >>> myfaces-archetype-helloworld-facelets // myfaces 1.2 + facelets > + > >>> tomahawk > >>> myfaces-archetype-helloworld-portlets // myfaces 1.2 + portlet > >>> bridge > >>> myfaces-archetype-jsfcomponents // simple components in > the > >>> old way, the next release will use myfaces builder plugin. > >>> myfaces-archetype-trinidad // myfaces 1.2 + > >>> trinidad > >>> > >>> It could be good to know what other archetypes are useful and what > other > >>> wiki pages are needed, to contribute and make another release of this > >>> project. > >>> > >>> regards > >>> > >>> Leonardo Uribe > >>> > >>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Grant Smith <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 !!! > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Andrew Robinson > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I was wondering if we would want to create maven archetypes for > >>>>> setting up trinidad, tomahawk, and other projects as a war file that > >>>>> users can use to start a test case. Basically it would create a war > >>>>> pom with a single page and a single managed bean with jetty support > >>>>> built in so that it would be easy to modify to get going. > >>>>> > >>>>> By doing this and building a WIKI page we could simply point bug > >>>>> reporters to the WIKI to give them instructions on how to build a > >>>>> simple test case that would not be IDE or platform specific and help > >>>>> with people that want to debug problems, but do not want to try each > >>>>> time to extract how to reproduce a problem. > >>>>> > >>>>> What do you all think? > >>>>> > >>>>> -Andrew > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Grant Smith > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > >
