Hi Adonis,thanks for your precious advice! I had a little bit more time to search for alternative fonts and I would like to share with you guys the other 5 proposals where I maintained the same concept of the original one but I used different font faces. Let me know what you think! cheers enrico
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Adonis Raduca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi, > > Nice idea, if we consider the scope of the project. > I think that the dark red X adds some complexity also some negative meaning > to the idea of validator, because has direct associations with errors. > We can think in both way after all: > - we use validator to identify errors. > - or we use validator to avoid errors. > I think the second one is better because it concentrate on the positive > aspect ... to avoid errors. > On the other side green is in vogue now because has environment friendly > connotations ... for that reason I use the green and brown colors to all > MyFaces logos. > We can go on that direction (the logo with the "v" stilled in a shape of a > green check sign) and to refine the logo. > I think is better to invest effort in refining what we have. > > Regarding what we have now: > In my opinion is there is a little problem with the character kerning: the > final "l" is a little to far from and the "a" is a little to close from the > green check sign. We also can work a little on the font, probably will be a > good idea to choose a highly new font (a font that is not older than several > years, also to not be a remake of a classical one). Another idea will be to > take a classic or a modern font and to modify a little in order to add a > personal signature, and why not to design from scratch all those characters, > we have only 5 after all. > > Also the green check symbol needs some refining. > > Unfortunately now I'm to busy to work on this logo ... but I hope that my > suggestions helps ... > > Have a nice day ! > Adonis > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > >> That logo is awesome. >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL >> PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> hi berti, >>> >>> I like that logo >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Enrico Berti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> > hi all, >>> > this is my personal interpretation of a possible logo for extval. >>> > It's something fresh, simple, with some recaps to both validation and >>> form >>> > fields. >>> > waiting for comments, of course! >>> > cheers, >>> > enrico >>> > >>> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Gerhard Petracek >>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> hello everyone, >>> >> >>> >> after some refactorings + adding some new features, we are basically >>> ready >>> >> for a first release. >>> >> the latest snapshot is available at [1] >>> >> >>> >> however, there are some open topics. >>> >> e.g. leonardo started with the site for extval. thank you leonardo! >>> i'll >>> >> join and add some information. >>> >> >>> >> furthermore, we need a logo for the project. >>> >> are there any ideas or suggestions for a nice logo? >>> >> >>> >> regards, >>> >> gerhard >>> >> >>> >> [1] >>> >> http://people.apache.org/~gpetracek/myfaces/extval/<http://people.apache.org/%7Egpetracek/myfaces/extval/> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> >>> >> http://www.irian.at >>> >> >>> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >>> >> JSF Consulting, Development and >>> >> Courses in English and German >>> >> >>> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> >
<<attachment: extval_logo_proposal_2.jpg>>
