I think that If commons should include components, then these components should be independent + have no UI.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Gerhard Petracek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello, > > i suggest to talk about the right place for new (and independent) > components in general. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2008/10/14 Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hello Team, >> >> I had previous old discussions with Volker about the future of the >> ExporterActionListener. >> >> And we agreed on moving this component to the MyFaces commons project. >> >> But after a discussion with Leonardo I know that commons does not include >> any components module? >> >> Now the two possible ways are: >> >> 1. Promoting the component to Tomahawk. >> 2. Making a new components module in commons and promote the component to >> it. >> >> I need your suggestions regarding that! >> >> Thanks all! >> >> -- >> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed >> >> Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets): >> >> http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370 >> >> Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog >> >> [Web 2.0] Google Maps Integration with JSF: >> http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/ >> > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets): http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370 Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog [Web 2.0] Google Maps Integration with JSF: http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/
