On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Yes I think Adam made a wiki for UIXNode conversion during the time of > incubation, I'll have to look for the link. > > As for JSF 2.0 adoption, I would say 2 years after the specification release > which is... not so soon. Implementation will start before that though and I > think it's what important for our side. So personally I would say clean up > the code... a lot as not only UIXNode need it, but wait for JSF 2.0 so that
+1 on an earlier clean-up than to wait on JSF 2 to do the clean-up. > our cleaning reflect JSF 2.0 changes, but working in a 1.2 environment. I > gully agree about 1.0 trunk, I have no motivation at all about it. yes. And with the advent of Trinidad2/JSF2 we also should send Trinidad 1.2 to maintaining stage (sure some bug fixes don't hurt) > > > Regards, > > ~ Simon > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Andrew Robinson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > However, as Matthias pointed out, JSF 2.0 standardize Trinidad's >> > principal >> > core features namely PPR and Resource handling and hopefully skinning >> > too. >> > Under such circumstances, I feel that we should wait for 2.0 to be >> > cemented >> > before going through a massive refactoring of some of the old and >> > twisted >> > code parts so that the refactored design is fully compatible with 1.2, >> > but >> > using 2.0 concept to make the upgrade to 2.0 easier imho. >> >> Although those are really good concerns, I wonder how long it will >> take JSF2 to be adopted. It seems like many are even reluctant to >> adopt 1.2. So I wonder if it is still worth it for us to make an >> effort to at least clean up the 1.2 trunk? (I did not mention the 1.0 >> trunk as I seem to have lost my desire to maintain the JSF 1.1 code >> myself) >> >> I guess it comes down to time and desire. I worry about the UIXNode >> conversion as I don't yet fully understand that code enough to feel >> comfortable porting it without missing things. I guess I could create >> sandbox renderers for the components, then if they look complete, we >> could promote them & replace the UIXNode ones at that time. Is there a >> WIKI page that I missed that talks about how to convert these guys or >> about any of the UIXNode architecture? >> >> -Andrew > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
