On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> As planned to release tomahawk, It could be good (optional) to release
>>> myfaces core 1.1.6.
>>>
>>> Is there any task left to do this? If no I'll start the release
>>> procedure.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> sounds good to me
>>
>>
> Sounds good to me too.
>
> One thing I have meant to do is to check that all the info from the (long
> obsolete) .xml files that sit next to the component .java files has been
> migrated to an appropriate place, then remove them. But that's not critical
> for a release.
>
> I would suggest giving the release candidate for this a reasonable time (>1
> week) for the user community to test. There have been some radical changes
> since the last release, and our unit tests are not great so getting
> real-world testing for this would be very useful.
>
> But I would also suggest stating in the RC announcement that only
> *regressions* from the 1.1.5 release will be looked at during the rc cycle.
> We need to get the release cycles going again, even with known issues - as
> long as they are not regressions.
>

Ok, sounds good taking into account the latest changes, but I have never
seen how a release candidate procedure works. I suppose it is the same as
normal release but there is no vote, just an announcement about it and where
to find the artifacts, and those artifacts are not published on main maven
repo, right?


>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>

Reply via email to