[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12571697#action_12571697
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on TRINIDAD-782:
-------------------------------------------
hello max,
(
- as i said - we can change the name
- i agree with you that there is no huge burden to wrap data. however, you know
what's the issue with opinions... :)
)
aside from that, i have no problem with your suggestion. let's convert:
workaround -> suggested approach.
however, we have to document it!
***result of the discussion***
we don't support filtering + sorting without a wrapper.
it's at least the quickest solution :) and we don't have to think about names
or an adequate implementation.
-> i'll file a documentation issue.
regards,
gerhard
> problem with filtering a sortable table
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: TRINIDAD-782
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-782
> Project: MyFaces Trinidad
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Components
> Affects Versions: 1.0.3-core
> Reporter: Gerhard Petracek
> Attachments: UIXCollection.patch
>
>
> SortableModel: missing re-indexing of a sorted model after model content has
> been filtered/changed (alternative: reset indices)
> further details: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg43802.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.