I would agree with Mario - the spec is wrong if this is treated differently.
regards, Martin On 1/3/08, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this one is a special guy; > > On Jan 3, 2008 11:37 AM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > AFAIK this tag-class is the only tag that the RI folks don't generate. > > > I don't like to fuck the plugin as well; so we could have this tag as > > > real code as well; > > > > > > regarding the std-faces-cfg I agree that HtmlColumn should > > > reflect it's type. > > > > > > With wrong, you talk about the UIColumn (since 1.2) itself ? > > > > > I think that mapping the javax.faces.Column to HtmlColumn in the > > HtmlColumnTag is wrong. If it is required by the spec, then the spec is > > wrong, no? > > Though, I don't know what's the idea behind all this .... I just don't > > think that any other component behaves that way. > > > > Ciao, > > Mario > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
