Mike's suggestion worked, I also found the help docs on the WIKI, I should have tried a little harder before sending an email :-)
Here is my progress so far: http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Facelets_and_JSF_1%2e1_maven-faces-plugin_Getting_started Will keep working on it as I have time. -Andrew On 9/25/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could just add it (at least for now) to > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins > > -- Adam > > > On 9/25/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay, stupid question, how do I create a new WIKI page for this > > getting started page? Do I simply need more privileges or did I miss > > something somewhere? > > > > On 9/25/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 9/25/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm planning on help with the documentation, and plan to add a new > > > > page to the WIKI for a "getting started" on using the > > > > maven-faces-plugin with facelets and jsf 1.1. > > > > > > That'd be awesome! > > > > > > > On the topic of what I brought up, would it be better to have the > > > > component type ID filter be placed on the dynamic content only and not > > > > on the included content (meaning the component tags from the plugin, > > > > but do not filter the faces-config-base.xml content)? > > > > > > That would be great, but... it'd require some "fun" rearchitecting. > > > The filtering is done in XSLT, after the merge with the base doc > > > has already happened. I agree that it's totally wacky that you explicitly > > > define something explicitly in faces-config-base.xml and then the > > > tool says "nope, you must not have *really* wanted that"! > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a good reason that I can't think of at the moment to filter > > > > all the faces-config content and not just the generated content? > > > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > We should probably get serious about at least documenting the big > > > > > "gotchas" of the faces plugin. I've started a subsection at > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins so we at least have > > > > > somewhere to put this sort of info. Andrew, stuff like this that you > > > > > discover would be great additions. > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > After investigating the code more, it is working as designed, I just > > > > > > expected different results. Please disregard this previous email of > > > > > > mine. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Changing my vote to a possible -1 for the release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just posted an email about the plugin not including elements > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > the faces-config-base.xml into the faces-config.xml. Unless I > > > > > > > screwed > > > > > > > up somehow, I'd like to see if this can be fixed before the > > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to > > > > > > > > > be released, > > > > > > > > > and why.............. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
