:-)

+1

On 4/18/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18/04/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> This will help to "finish" the 1.2 development. I am not sure about a
> complete merge of the head and the 1.2 branch (it is a lot of work!).
> Maybe I will put the 1.2 branch as trunk and apply fixes (maybe

Read "I would put" instead of "I will" :-)

> existing fixes in for 1.1) in the trunk as the issues arise?) However,
> if you want to tackle the merge, I am up for it... :-)
>
> Cheers
>
> Bruno
>
> On 18/04/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi *,
> >
> > this is a formal vote on using the 1.2 branch as current now.
> >
> > Steps in doing this:
> >
> > - branch the current head as 1.1.5_1
> > - merge down the 1.2 branch to current head (that will be a lot of
> > work, I'll tackle it)
> >
> > my +1 for doing this right now.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>



--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Reply via email to