On 4/18/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121) schrieb: > > Do you mean replicating the tomahawk-components or different > > components under the tomahawk-sign? > > > Different components, I have had this idea for some time now. > Most html based components are not really portable. > For instance our dojo work currently would get a huge speed boost > if we could do a facelet version first because we could concentrate on > the markup. > The html editor for instance basically would be a few lines snap in code > that way. > I think having something, either in myfaces, or in jsf-comp with good > links would be a huge boost. Because people could donate components more > easily than having to go through the entire component api mess (sorry if > the persons responsible for it are reading this, but this is my opinion) > > The "downside" would be that those components would enforce the usage > facelets and xhmtl.
Werner, I don't see a problem with this for the sandbox. In fact, this is how I do all of my component development -- first I write a facelets version (ie, no JSP tags or tld stuff), then, if I want to give the component a wider distribution audience, I go ahead and write the JSP stuff. I personally don't see anything wrong with letting someone else implement the JSP tag handler part if they want to use it with JSP. "Scratch your own itch" and all that. The JSP tag writing should be pretty mechanical (albeit boring) work. Maybe we could write a script to generate them :)
