I'll remove it back to impl. ok? On 2/22/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ah, I see... ok, yes. there is no standard way for doing this right now. > > thanks for pointing it out! > > On 2/22/06, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No compile issue, but a functional: The MyFaces impl sets a request > > scope flag during the Lifecylce. Without this flag both methods in > > PortletUtil always return false. > > > > Manfred > > > > > > On 2/22/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > damn... pressed send by accident > > > > > > The *beast* has the following import statements > > > > > > import javax.faces.context.FacesContext; > > > import javax.portlet.RenderResponse; > > > > > > > > > so, it needs JSF API and PORTLET API > > > > > > no MyFaces stuff needed ;) > > > > > > On 2/22/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I removed to clazz to commons. > > > > > > > > Why are you asking, any problems ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/22/06, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Stan, > > > > > The PortletUtil class currently only works with the MyFaces > > > > > implementation, right? > > > > > Therefore I think we should move it to impl source root to make this > > > > > clear for the end user. > > > > > Any objections to this? > > > > > > > > > > Manfred > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 > > > > 50674 Köln > > > > http://www.wessendorf.net > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 > > > 50674 Köln > > > http://www.wessendorf.net > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 > 50674 Köln > http://www.wessendorf.net > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
-- Matthias Wessendorf Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 50674 Köln http://www.wessendorf.net mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
