[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-754?page=comments#action_12356927 ]
Grant Smith commented on MYFACES-754: ------------------------------------- In principle I agree, for releases and release candidates. However, for the nightly build I'd prefer a static name. The reason being that I'd hate to be continually updating my dependencies. I also believe we should preserve the versions in the downloaded dependent jars. > Version within jar-names > ------------------------ > > Key: MYFACES-754 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-754 > Project: MyFaces > Type: Improvement > Components: General > Reporter: Stephan Strittmatter > Priority: Trivial > > IMHO it would be a good idea to include the version within the jar-names. > E.g: > * myfaces-all-1.1.1RC3.jar > * tomahawk-1.1.1RC3.jar > * myfaces-all-1.1.0.jar > ... > This is also the naming many other projects support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
